2910 on the Square

Redesigning the information architecture and experience of a local shop's
e-commerce website.

How I started

2910 on the Square is an incredible little gift shop located in my hometown, Baltimore. I was looking into buying some Maryland and Baltimore-themed trinkets for gifts and visited their online store. It was obvious by the updates about COVID-19 that the store owner cares about the website being up to date and accurate, but the entire experience was this incredible headache that made me want to leave.

At the heart of it all was the navigation bar, which I along with users found terribly confusing. It was impossible to find anything! So, I sought out to redesign 2910 on the Square's website, focusing on information architecture. By doing so, I hoped to create a more enjoyable, easy-to-understand website.

DURATION

2 week sprint

METHODS

Tree testing

Competitive research

Prototyping

Rapid usability testing

SOLE DESIGNER

Annie Im

TOOLS

Sketch

Zoom

Optimal Workshop

At a glance

PROBLEM

Users would like to buy gifts from 2910 on the Square's online store, but the website's navigation is confusing and frustrating, and the products are unorganized, making it difficult to find exactly what they are looking for.



INSIGHTS

2910 on the Square's website led users to believe that the store was outdated, out-of-touch, and limited in stock.


SOLUTION

A website with a fresh, visual refresh and a navigation scheme that users find intuitive.

Let's get into the nitty gritty


Our methodology

We started by analyzing the product ourselves to understand what problems we might encounter in user research. Once we understood potential issues, we asked new users to navigate the current product. From this data, we were able to define pain points within the current app and possible solutions. Having identified these things, we jumped into fleshing out the solution—ideating, prototyping, and testing.

Below, you can see the details for each of these steps.

PRELIMINARY RESEARCH

How are we voting now?

When thinking of voting, most people think of in-person voting and mail-in voting. For the majority of the population, these methods work. But, there are problems in the system.

This isn't working.

In-person voting

  • Long waiting lines.
  • No rest areas.
  • Large crowds.
  • No time off of work.

Mail-in voting

  • In many states, you have to apply/need an excuse.
  • You need a secure mailing address.
  • No assistance for voters with disabilities/language barriers.
  • The postal service is sometimes unreliable and hard to time.

What are the other solutions out there?

Democracy Live is the online voting platform currently used in West Virginia. It's a slightly complicated system, however, with some of the same issues as before.

  • Voters must apply by going in person to the county clerk.
  • Voters may submit online, by email, mail, or fax.
  • No assistance provided.
  • A long process that can get confusing.


View Democracy Live task analysis

close section

USER INTERVIEWS

Defining our user

The problems in the current voting systems disproportionately leave behind:

  • The elderly
  • The disabled
  • Citizens abroad

What we wanted to learn

  • Users' comfortability with completing tasks with sensitive information, such as government related tasks, online. 
  • Users' feelings on security and privacy online.
  • Users' current voting habits.

What we did learn

We interviewed six people who fit within our defined user base. What we found was this:

  • Most users have had accessibility issues with voting in person.
  • Users' digital privacy is incredibly important to them. Most users take proactive steps to protect themselves online.
  • Users are comfortable completing government tasks and providing personal data online. (So long as that information is for the government)

Focus Pocus

These findings tell us that we need to prioritize:

  • Security
  • Accessibility
  • Simplicity

close section

PERSONA & USER JOURNEY

Gayatri is sick of voting in person!

Gayatri is a fictional persona based off of the data we collected. She represents the very real needs, desires, and frustrations of our user base.

Gayatri is in her mid 50s and has fibromyalgia. In the past she has had to bring her own shade and seating, and asking for accessibility aids hasn't been met with success.

The Scenario

Gayatri is voting in this year’s local elections. Due to her physical limitations, she has chosen to vote via Mail-In Ballot in lieu of voting in-person. She is hoping she can register & submit her ballot in time to be counted in the upcoming elections, while also feeling confident that her ballot was actually received.

What we learn

Having identified Gayatri's pain points, we discover these opportunities:

  • An online voting process that would eliminate the need for physical documents to be scanned.
  • An option to input votes directly into systems online for submission.
  • Online confirmation of ballot being submitted.

close section

PROBLEM & SOLUTION

Let’s distill the problem:

Gayatri needs a better way to exercise her right to vote because her physical limitations have made it difficult to vote in person without compromising her personal health & safety.

Defining a solution:

If we create a mobile app that allows all users to easily and securely place votes, Gayatri will feel safe, capable, and confident in her voting activities.

close section

PROTOTYPING

Where we went first

Through our low-fidelity prototype, we were able to flesh out our principles of security, accessibility, and simplicity.

Screens from our low-fidelity prototype. Click to see more.

close section

USABILITY TESTING

How enjoyable is the experience?

We tasked these real-life Gayatris with:

  • Verifying their identity using a document.
  • Voting in the 2020 general election.

Through these tasks, we hoped to observe their understanding of the multiple ways to discover and contact other users as well as an innate understanding of our features themselves.

What we learned

We interviewed 10 people who fit within our defined user base. What we found was this:

  • Users found the app straightforward and easy to understand.
  • Users weren't sure how safe they felt with biometrics.
  • A few users wanted more feedback from the app.

Immediate solutions

We implemented these changes:

  • Removing mandatory biometrics.
  • Adding more feedback from the app confirming identity security measures and ballot casting took place.

close section

Please contact me for more details.